SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Basking

Other Workplace and visitor management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Basking. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 38 that differ from Basking on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Basking has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Basking” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at BaskingFound at Basking, not found there
OfficeRnDofficernd.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OfficeRnD 65/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 1 Public pricing Compare
Teamgoteamgo.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Teamgo 65/100 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 1 Named privacy contact Compare
FacilityOSfacilityos.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FacilityOS 61/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Sinesine.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Sine 59/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Public pricing Compare
Clearoomsclearooms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clearooms 57/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 1 Data location stated Compare
Envoyenvoy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Envoy 43/100 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Sign In Solutionssigninsolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sign In Solutions 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Robinrobinpowered.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Robin 48/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Kadencekadence.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Kadence 35/100 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Sign In Appsigninapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sign In App 39/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Joangetjoan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Joan 35/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
YAROOMSyarooms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to YAROOMS 35/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.