Transparency alternatives to Union Impact
Other Association management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Union Impact. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 27 that differ from Union Impact on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Union Impact has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Union Impact” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Union Impact | Found at Union Impact, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wild Apricotwildapricot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Wild Apricot | 70/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| TidyHQtidyhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TidyHQ | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| GrowthZonegrowthzone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GrowthZone | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Membermeistermembermeister.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Membermeister | 35/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Amiliaamilia.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Amilia | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Rakletraklet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Raklet | 30/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Novi AMSnoviams.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Novi AMS | 30/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| ROC-Proc-p.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ROC-P | 22/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Campaicampai.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Campai | 13/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Class Managerclassmanager.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Class Manager | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | nothing | Compare |
| Fontevafonteva.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fonteva | 22/100 | 1 Data location stated | nothing | Compare |
| Traction Rectractionrec.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Traction Rec | 22/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.