SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Copper

Other CRM vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Copper does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from Copper on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Copper has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Copper does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Copper does notCopper publishes, and they do not
Pipedrivepipedrive.com 74/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
Insightlyinsightly.com 60/100 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Freshworksfreshworks.com 39/100 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Capsulecapsulecrm.com 65/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named nothing Compare
EspoCRMespocrm.com 65/100 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list 1 Status page with history Compare
Nutshellnutshell.com 65/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named nothing Compare
Teamleaderteamleader.eu 59/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
HubSpothubspot.com 55/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Coeveracoevera.com 41/100 1 Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
Weclappweclapp.com 26/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Closeclose.com 25/100 1 Certifications named 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Zoho CRMzoho.com 25/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.