Transparency alternatives to SuiteDash
Other CRM vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at SuiteDash. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 107 that differ from SuiteDash on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
SuiteDash has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at SuiteDash” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at SuiteDash | Found at SuiteDash, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Teamleaderteamleader.euSee also Transparency alternatives to Teamleader | 59/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Insightlyinsightly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Insightly | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Clarifyclarify.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Clarify | 70/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Capsulecapsulecrm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Capsule | 52/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| HubSpothubspot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HubSpot | 52/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Nutshellnutshell.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nutshell | 52/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Freshworksfreshworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Freshworks | 39/100 | 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| Closeclose.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Close | 35/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Tubulartubular.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Tubular | 26/100 | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| EspoCRMespocrm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EspoCRM | 65/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| EngageBayengagebay.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EngageBay | 57/100 | 2 Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Coppercopper.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Copper | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.