Transparency alternatives to NetHunt
Other CRM vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at NetHunt. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 108 that differ from NetHunt on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
NetHunt has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at NetHunt” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at NetHunt | Found at NetHunt, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| HubSpothubspot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HubSpot | 52/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Freshworks (Freshsales)freshworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Freshworks (Freshsales) | 39/100 | 6 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Clarifyclarify.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Clarify | 70/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Insightlyinsightly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Insightly | 61/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Nutshellnutshell.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nutshell | 65/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Teamleaderteamleader.euSee also Transparency alternatives to Teamleader | 59/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Twentytwenty.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Twenty | 52/100 | 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Coppercopper.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Copper | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Vtigervtiger.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vtiger | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Coeveracoevera.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Coevera | 41/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Closeclose.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Close | 35/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| EspoCRMespocrm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EspoCRM | 65/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.