Transparency alternatives to Dock
Other Customer success and onboarding vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Dock. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 35 that differ from Dock on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Dock has 2 gaps in what we could measure: No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Dock” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Dock | Found at Dock, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Custcust.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Cust | 39/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Demostackdemostack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Demostack | 35/100 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Totangototango.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Totango | 74/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Rocketlanerocketlane.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rocketlane | 68/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Gainsightgainsight.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gainsight | 61/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Arcadearcade.softwareSee also Transparency alternatives to Arcade | 57/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Inline Manualinlinemanual.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Inline Manual | 57/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Navatticnavattic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Navattic | 57/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Chameleontrychameleon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chameleon | 48/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| ClientSuccessclientsuccess.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ClientSuccess | 48/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
| Reprisereprise.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reprise | 48/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Custifycustify.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Custify | 43/100 | nothing we found there and not here | 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.