Transparency alternatives to Totango
Other Customer success and onboarding vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Totango. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 35 that differ from Totango on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Totango has 4 gaps in what we could measure: Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Totango” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Totango | Found at Totango, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Custcust.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Cust | 39/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Dockdock.usSee also Transparency alternatives to Dock | 87/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Rocketlanerocketlane.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rocketlane | 68/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Arcadearcade.softwareSee also Transparency alternatives to Arcade | 57/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| Inline Manualinlinemanual.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Inline Manual | 57/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 4 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Chameleontrychameleon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chameleon | 48/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | Compare |
| ClientSuccessclientsuccess.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ClientSuccess | 48/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
| Akitaakitaapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Akita | 35/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | Compare |
| Demostackdemostack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Demostack | 35/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Frigadefrigade.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Frigade | 26/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | Compare |
| Guideflowguideflow.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Guideflow | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
| Superedsupered.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Supered | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.