Transparency alternatives to CIB doXisafe
Other Document management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that CIB doXisafe does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 62 that differ from CIB doXisafe on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
CIB doXisafe has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and CIB doXisafe does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and CIB doXisafe does not | CIB doXisafe publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Templafytemplafy.com | 74/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| CloudFilescloudfiles.io | 70/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Intralinksintralinks.com | 70/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Onehubonehub.com | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Smallpdfsmallpdf.com | 57/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Laserfichelaserfiche.com | 52/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| DynaFiledynafile.com | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Papermarkpapermark.com | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Ademeroademero.com | 35/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Folderitfolderit.com | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing | nothing | Compare |
| PaperOfficepaperoffice.com | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Fabasoftfabasoft.com | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.