Transparency alternatives to Grip
Other Event management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Grip. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 47 that differ from Grip on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Grip has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Grip” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Grip | Found at Grip, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Stovastova.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Stova | 78/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Mentimetermentimeter.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mentimeter | 65/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +4 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Swapcardswapcard.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Swapcard | 35/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Bizzabobizzabo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bizzabo | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Fourwavesfourwaves.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fourwaves | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Slidoslido.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Slido | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Crowdcastcrowdcast.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Crowdcast | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Zuddlzuddl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zuddl | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Acceleventsaccelevents.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Accelevents | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Eventzillaeventzilla.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Eventzilla | 30/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| EventWorksgeteventworks.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EventWorks | 43/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Schedsched.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sched | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.