SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Arez

Other Field service management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Arez does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 56 that differ from Arez on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Arez has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Arez does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Arez does notArez publishes, and they do not
ServiceM8servicem8.com 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change 1 Certifications named Compare
ServiceTitanservicetitan.com 30/100 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Fulcrumfulcrumapp.com 45/100 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Praxedopraxedo.com 43/100 2 Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Named privacy contact Compare
FieldEdgefieldedge.com 36/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Jobbergetjobber.com 35/100 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Housecall Prohousecallpro.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Skeduloskedulo.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Tap Inspecttapinspect.com 30/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Uptickuptickhq.com 30/100 1 Status page with history 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Bella FSMbellafsm.com 26/100 1 No third-party tracking before consent 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Fieldcodefieldcode.com 26/100 1 Data location stated 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.