SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to FieldEdge

Other Field service management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at FieldEdge. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 56 that differ from FieldEdge on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

FieldEdge has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at FieldEdge” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at FieldEdgeFound at FieldEdge, not found there
ServiceM8servicem8.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ServiceM8 48/100 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Praxedopraxedo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Praxedo 43/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Fulcrumfulcrumapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fulcrum 45/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named 1 Data location stated Compare
Jobbergetjobber.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jobber 35/100 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
Payacapayaca.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Payaca 35/100 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
ServiceTitanservicetitan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ServiceTitan 30/100 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Uptickuptickhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Uptick 30/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Arezarez.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Arez 26/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Status page with history Compare
Bella FSMbellafsm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bella FSM 26/100 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact Compare
ServicePowerservicepower.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ServicePower 26/100 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Public pricing Compare
Fieldpointfieldpoint.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Fieldpoint 26/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Tradifytradifyhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Tradify 26/100 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.