Alternatives to Jobber
Other Field service management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Jobber does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 20 that differ from Jobber on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Jobber has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Jobber does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Jobber does not | Jobber publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| ServiceM8servicem8.com | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | Compare |
| Praxedopraxedo.com | 43/100 | 2 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| FieldEdgefieldedge.com | 36/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Aspireyouraspire.com | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| FieldAwarefieldaware.com | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| OptimoRouteoptimoroute.com | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Payacapayaca.com | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| BigChangebigchange.com | 17/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Housecall Prohousecallpro.com | 30/100 | 1 Status page with history | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Fieldcodefieldcode.com | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Fieldpointfieldpoint.net | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Fergusfergus.com | 22/100 | 1 Data processing agreement | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.