Alternatives to ServiceM8
Other Field service management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that ServiceM8 does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 20 that differ from ServiceM8 on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
ServiceM8 has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and ServiceM8 does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and ServiceM8 does not | ServiceM8 publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jobbergetjobber.com | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Praxedopraxedo.com | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| FieldEdgefieldedge.com | 36/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Aspireyouraspire.com | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Housecall Prohousecallpro.com | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
| FieldAwarefieldaware.com | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Payacapayaca.com | 22/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
| Workizworkiz.com | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| Fieldcodefieldcode.com | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Fieldpointfieldpoint.net | 26/100 | 1 Data location stated | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| OptimoRouteoptimoroute.com | 22/100 | 1 Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| BigChangebigchange.com | 17/100 | 1 Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.