Transparency alternatives to ServiceM8
Other Field service management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at ServiceM8. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 56 that differ from ServiceM8 on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
ServiceM8 has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at ServiceM8” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at ServiceM8 | Found at ServiceM8, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Payacapayaca.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Payaca | 35/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
| Fulcrumfulcrumapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Fulcrum | 45/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Praxedopraxedo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Praxedo | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| FieldEdgefieldedge.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FieldEdge | 36/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Housecall Prohousecallpro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Housecall Pro | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | 5 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | Compare |
| ServiceTitanservicetitan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ServiceTitan | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Uptickuptickhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Uptick | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
| ServicePowerservicepower.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ServicePower | 26/100 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Skeduloskedulo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Skedulo | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Jobbergetjobber.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jobber | 35/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 3 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Arezarez.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Arez | 26/100 | 1 Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Bella FSMbellafsm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bella FSM | 26/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.