Alternatives to ServiceTitan
Other Field service management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that ServiceTitan does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 26 that differ from ServiceTitan on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
ServiceTitan has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and ServiceTitan does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and ServiceTitan does not | ServiceTitan publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Praxedopraxedo.com | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 4 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Jobbergetjobber.com | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| ServiceM8servicem8.com | 48/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| FieldEdgefieldedge.com | 36/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Housecall Prohousecallpro.com | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 4 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Skeduloskedulo.com | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | 3 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Workizworkiz.com | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 4 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| Fieldcodefieldcode.com | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 4 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Fergusfergus.com | 22/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | 5 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | Compare |
| Payacapayaca.com | 22/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 4 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | Compare |
| BigChangebigchange.com | 17/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 4 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | Compare |
| Aspireyouraspire.com | 35/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.