Transparency alternatives to Fulcrum
Other Field service management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Fulcrum. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 56 that differ from Fulcrum on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Fulcrum has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Fulcrum” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Fulcrum | Found at Fulcrum, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jobbergetjobber.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jobber | 35/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| ServiceTitanservicetitan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ServiceTitan | 30/100 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Bella FSMbellafsm.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bella FSM | 26/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Fieldpointfieldpoint.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Fieldpoint | 26/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| KorTerrakorterra.comSee also Transparency alternatives to KorTerra | 22/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | Compare |
| ServiceM8servicem8.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ServiceM8 | 48/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| FieldEdgefieldedge.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FieldEdge | 36/100 | 1 Data location stated | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | Compare |
| Payacapayaca.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Payaca | 35/100 | 1 Subprocessor list | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Housecall Prohousecallpro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Housecall Pro | 30/100 | 1 Data location stated | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Praxedopraxedo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Praxedo | 30/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Uptickuptickhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Uptick | 30/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Arezarez.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Arez | 26/100 | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.