SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Finstack

Other Financial planning and close vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Finstack. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 45 that differ from Finstack on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Finstack has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Finstack” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at FinstackFound at Finstack, not found there
Leapfinleapfin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Leapfin 61/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 1 Certifications named Compare
Venavenasolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vena 52/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
SecureSheetsecuresheet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SecureSheet 35/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare
Alephgetaleph.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aleph 39/100 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated 1 Certifications named Compare
BlackLineblackline.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BlackLine 38/100 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Pigmentpigment.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pigment 35/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
FloQastfloqast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FloQast 30/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
IDUidusoft.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IDU 30/100 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Kardinkardin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kardin 30/100 2 Data location stated, Public pricing 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Treasury Intelligencetis.bizSee also Transparency alternatives to Treasury Intelligence 26/100 2 Status page with history, Public pricing 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Pliantgetpliant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pliant 22/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact Compare
Agicapagicap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agicap 17/100 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.