Transparency alternatives to Inpensa
Other Financial planning and close vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Inpensa. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 43 that differ from Inpensa on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Inpensa has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Inpensa” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Inpensa | Found at Inpensa, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leapfinleapfin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Leapfin | 61/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Drivetraindrivetrain.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Drivetrain | 52/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Venavenasolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vena | 52/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Alephgetaleph.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aleph | 39/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| FloQastfloqast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FloQast | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| BlackLineblackline.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BlackLine | 38/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| SecureSheetsecuresheet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SecureSheet | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Datarailsdatarails.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Datarails | 30/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Pigmentpigment.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pigment | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Planfulplanful.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Planful | 30/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Anaplananaplan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Anaplan | 26/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| IDUidusoft.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IDU | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.