SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Handel RiteTrack

Other Software for local government vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Handel RiteTrack. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 49 that differ from Handel RiteTrack on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Handel RiteTrack has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Handel RiteTrack” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at Handel RiteTrackFound at Handel RiteTrack, not found there
Submittablesubmittable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Submittable 52/100 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
Fluxxfluxx.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Fluxx 43/100 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +3 nothing Compare
Foundantfoundant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Foundant 39/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Rekorrekor.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Rekor 39/100 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 nothing Compare
Accelaaccela.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Accela 35/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
ProudCityproudcity.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ProudCity 26/100 4 Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Axonaxon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Axon 26/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Polcopolco.usSee also Transparency alternatives to Polco 26/100 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
ARMSarms.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ARMS 17/100 3 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
Granicusgranicus.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Granicus 17/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Mark43mark43.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mark43 17/100 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Harris Correctionsharriscorrections.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Harris Corrections 22/100 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.