Transparency alternatives to Justworks
Other HR and payroll vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Justworks. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 73 that differ from Justworks on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Justworks has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Justworks” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Justworks | Found at Justworks, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Oysteroysterhr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Oyster | 74/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Sloneeksloneek.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sloneek | 65/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| BambooHRbamboohr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BambooHR | 70/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Factorialfactorialhr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Factorial | 61/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Humaanshumaans.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Humaans | 35/100 | 5 Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Namelynamely.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Namely | 48/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Charlie HRcharliehr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Charlie HR | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Lanolano.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Lano | 39/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Peblhellopebl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pebl | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| ADPadp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ADP | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| NEOGOVneogov.comSee also Transparency alternatives to NEOGOV | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Deeldeel.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deel | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.