SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Rippling

Other HR and payroll vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Rippling does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 19 that differ from Rippling on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Rippling has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Rippling does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Rippling does notRippling publishes, and they do not
Oysteroysterhr.com 74/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated 1 Status page with history Compare
Factorialfactorialhr.com 65/100 2 Subprocessor list, Data location stated nothing Compare
BambooHRbamboohr.com 61/100 2 Data processing agreement, Data location stated 1 Status page with history Compare
Deeldeel.com 55/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) nothing Compare
Employment Heroemploymenthero.com 48/100 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Certifications named Compare
Namelynamely.com 48/100 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Certifications named Compare
Multiplierusemultiplier.com 43/100 1 Subprocessor list 1 Certifications named Compare
Peblhellopebl.com 39/100 1 Data processing agreement 1 Public pricing Compare
Workdayworkday.com 25/100 1 Data location stated 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
TriNettrinet.com 24/100 1 Data location stated 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
PayFitpayfit.com 22/100 1 Data location stated 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Kenjokenjo.io 17/100 1 Data location stated 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.