Transparency alternatives to Shoreline
Other Incident management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Shoreline. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 29 that differ from Shoreline on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Shoreline has 11 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Shoreline” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Shoreline | Found at Shoreline, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hyperpinghyperping.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Hyperping | 74/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| incident.ioincident.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to incident.io | 65/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Public pricing, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| Moogsoftmoogsoft.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Moogsoft | 61/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| OhDearohdear.appSee also Transparency alternatives to OhDear | 61/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Resolveresolve.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Resolve | 57/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Uptime.comuptime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Uptime.com | 48/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| All Quietallquiet.appSee also Transparency alternatives to All Quiet | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| BigPandabigpanda.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to BigPanda | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Everbridgeeverbridge.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Everbridge | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| ilertilert.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ilert | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Rootlyrootly.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rootly | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| PagerDutypagerduty.comSee also Transparency alternatives to PagerDuty | 39/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.