Transparency alternatives to IT Portal
Other IT documentation and asset tracking vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at IT Portal. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 39 that differ from IT Portal on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
IT Portal has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at IT Portal” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at IT Portal | Found at IT Portal, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Electricelectric.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Electric | 48/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Zlurizluri.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zluri | 48/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
| Orbusorbussoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Orbus | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Zylozylo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Zylo | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Bizzdesignbizzdesign.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bizzdesign | 38/100 | 5 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Planviewplanview.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Planview | 48/100 | 4 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Cledaracledara.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cledara | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Reftabreftab.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reftab | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Toriitoriihq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Torii | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Subprocessor list, Public pricing | Compare |
| Setylsetyl.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Setyl | 57/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Ardoqardoq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ardoq | 52/100 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | nothing | Compare |
| Lansweeperlansweeper.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Lansweeper | 39/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.