Transparency alternatives to EasyVista
Other IT service management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at EasyVista. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 30 that differ from EasyVista on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
EasyVista has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at EasyVista” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at EasyVista | Found at EasyVista, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Rezolverezolve.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Rezolve | 65/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Atlassianatlassian.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Atlassian | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Atomicworkatomicwork.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Atomicwork | 61/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Alloy Softwarealloysoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Alloy Software | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Xurrentxurrent.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Xurrent | 41/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Siitsiit.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Siit | 39/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Ciresoncireson.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cireson | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Ivantiivanti.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ivanti | 39/100 | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | nothing | Compare |
| GLPIglpi-project.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to GLPI | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| ManageEnginemanageengine.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ManageEngine | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| OTRSotrs.comSee also Transparency alternatives to OTRS | 35/100 | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| SysAidsysaid.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SysAid | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.