SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Vivantio

Other IT service management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Vivantio does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 27 that differ from Vivantio on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Vivantio has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and Vivantio does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Vivantio does notVivantio publishes, and they do not
Atlassianatlassian.com 78/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 1 Public pricing Compare
HaloITSMhaloitsm.com 60/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure 1 Status page with history Compare
Rezolverezolve.ai 65/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named nothing Compare
Atomicworkatomicwork.com 52/100 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
ManageEnginemanageengine.com 35/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
OTRSotrs.com 35/100 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Alloy Softwarealloysoftware.com 30/100 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Siitsiit.io 50/100 1 Certifications named nothing Compare
Xurrentxurrent.com 42/100 1 Certifications named 1 Public pricing Compare
Issuetrakissuetrak.com 40/100 1 Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
Ivantiivanti.com 39/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Public pricing Compare
TOPdesktopdesk.com 35/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 1 Data location stated Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.