Transparency alternatives to Rspace
Other Laboratory information systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Rspace. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
Need a functional replacement? Run a synthetic sample trial before comparing product fit. This disclosure table cannot establish which modules or workflows another product can replace. Follow the sample workflow checklist.
12 shown of 46 that differ from Rspace on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Rspace has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Rspace” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Rspace | Found at Rspace, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nethealth Labnethealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nethealth Lab | 52/100 | 3 Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| LIMSeylimsey.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LIMSey | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | nothing | Compare |
| Benchlingbenchling.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Benchling | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Named privacy contact | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| IGORigorlabapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IGOR | 39/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Scispotscispot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scispot | 35/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | Compare |
| Genemodgenemod.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Genemod | 30/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Quartzyquartzy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Quartzy | 30/100 | 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Certifications named | Compare |
| Dornerdorner.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Dorner | 22/100 | 2 No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Opus Lsysmex.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Opus L | 9/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Dotmaticsdotmatics.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dotmatics | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Magic Touchmagictouchsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Magic Touch | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| SciSurescisure.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SciSure | 26/100 | 1 Named privacy contact | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.