Transparency alternatives to SciSure
Other Laboratory information systems vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at SciSure. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
Need a functional replacement? Run a synthetic sample trial before comparing product fit. This disclosure table cannot establish which modules or workflows another product can replace. Follow the sample workflow checklist.
12 shown of 43 that differ from SciSure on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
SciSure has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at SciSure” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at SciSure | Found at SciSure, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nethealth Labnethealth.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Nethealth Lab | 52/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Scispotscispot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Scispot | 43/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| LIMSeylimsey.comSee also Transparency alternatives to LIMSey | 48/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| IGORigorlabapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to IGOR | 39/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Quartzyquartzy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Quartzy | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Benchlingbenchling.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Benchling | 43/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Genemodgenemod.netSee also Transparency alternatives to Genemod | 43/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Rspaceresearchspace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rspace | 35/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 1 Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Labsteplabstep.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Labstep | 30/100 | 1 Certifications named | nothing | Compare |
| Magic Touchmagictouchsoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Magic Touch | 26/100 | 1 Public pricing | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Dornerdorner.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Dorner | 22/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| Ilisilis.deSee also Transparency alternatives to Ilis | 22/100 | 1 No third-party tracking before consent | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.