SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Beehiiv

Other Marketing automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Beehiiv. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 34 that differ from Beehiiv on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Beehiiv has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Beehiiv” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at BeehiivFound at Beehiiv, not found there
Airshipairship.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Airship 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Insider Oneinsiderone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Insider One 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 2 Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Mappmapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mapp 52/100 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Customerlycustomerly.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Customerly 57/100 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Certifications named 1 Status page with history Compare
GetResponsegetresponse.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GetResponse 57/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Bloomreachbloomreach.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bloomreach 48/100 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
CleverTapclevertap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CleverTap 39/100 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Keapkeap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Keap 61/100 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list nothing Compare
Loopsloops.soSee also Transparency alternatives to Loops 52/100 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list 1 Public pricing Compare
Verogetvero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vero 43/100 2 Data location stated, Certifications named 1 Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Brazebraze.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Braze 35/100 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Quentnquentn.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Quentn 30/100 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.