SaaS Ranking

Alternatives to Vero

Other Marketing automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Vero does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 21 that differ from Vero on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Vero has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Vero does not” is the one that closes them.

VendorScorePublishes, and Vero does notVero publishes, and they do not
Insideruseinsider.com 50/100 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing Compare
Loopsloops.so 75/100 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list 1 Certifications named Compare
Keapkeap.com 61/100 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list 2 Data location stated, Certifications named Compare
Airshipairship.com 52/100 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Mappmapp.com 52/100 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Customerlycustomerly.io 57/100 1 Subprocessor list 1 Status page with history Compare
Postscriptpostscript.io 56/100 1 Data processing agreement 1 Certifications named Compare
CleverTapclevertap.com 55/100 1 Data processing agreement 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
GetResponsegetresponse.com 50/100 1 Data processing agreement 1 Data location stated Compare
Brazebraze.com 48/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Public pricing, Certifications named Compare
Bloomreachbloomreach.com 35/100 1 Subprocessor list 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Orttoortto.com 30/100 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.