Transparency alternatives to Loops
Other Marketing automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Loops. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 34 that differ from Loops on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Loops has 7 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Loops” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Loops | Found at Loops, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mappmapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mapp | 52/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Customerlycustomerly.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Customerly | 57/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | Compare |
| GetResponsegetresponse.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GetResponse | 57/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Airshipairship.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Airship | 52/100 | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | Compare |
| Bloomreachbloomreach.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bloomreach | 48/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Verogetvero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vero | 43/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| CleverTapclevertap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CleverTap | 39/100 | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Quentnquentn.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Quentn | 30/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | Compare |
| Insider Oneinsiderone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Insider One | 52/100 | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Brazebraze.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Braze | 35/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list | Compare |
| SendPulsesendpulse.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SendPulse | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +1 | Compare |
| Upp.aiupp.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Upp.ai | 30/100 | 2 Public pricing, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.