Transparency alternatives to Bloomreach
Other Marketing automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Bloomreach. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 34 that differ from Bloomreach on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Bloomreach has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Bloomreach” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Bloomreach | Found at Bloomreach, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airshipairship.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Airship | 52/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Mappmapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mapp | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Keapkeap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Keap | 61/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Customerlycustomerly.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Customerly | 57/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| GetResponsegetresponse.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GetResponse | 57/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Subprocessor list | Compare |
| Postscriptpostscript.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Postscript | 56/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Insider Oneinsiderone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Insider One | 52/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Loopsloops.soSee also Transparency alternatives to Loops | 52/100 | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Verogetvero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vero | 43/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Subprocessor list, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Brazebraze.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Braze | 35/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Levitatelevitate.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Levitate | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Quentnquentn.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Quentn | 30/100 | 2 Data location stated, No third-party tracking before consent | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.