Alternatives to Insider
Other Marketing automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Insider does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 21 that differ from Insider on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Insider has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Insider does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Insider does not | Insider publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loopsloops.so | 75/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| CleverTapclevertap.com | 55/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Mappmapp.com | 52/100 | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Verogetvero.com | 50/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Beehiivbeehiiv.com | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Brazebraze.com | 48/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Act-Onact-on.com | 45/100 | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
| Keapkeap.com | 61/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Customerlycustomerly.io | 57/100 | 2 Data location stated, Public pricing | 2 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Postscriptpostscript.io | 56/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Airshipairship.com | 52/100 | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| GetResponsegetresponse.com | 50/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.