Alternatives to Airship
Other Marketing automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Airship does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 21 that differ from Airship on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Airship has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “publishes and Airship does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Airship does not | Airship publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| CleverTapclevertap.com | 55/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| GetResponsegetresponse.com | 50/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 3 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Loopsloops.so | 75/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Keapkeap.com | 61/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Postscriptpostscript.io | 56/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Mappmapp.com | 52/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Insideruseinsider.com | 50/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Verogetvero.com | 50/100 | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Customerlycustomerly.io | 57/100 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Beehiivbeehiiv.com | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 3 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Act-Onact-on.com | 45/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 2 Subprocessor list, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Bloomreachbloomreach.com | 35/100 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.