Alternatives to Mapp
Other Marketing automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Mapp does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 21 that differ from Mapp on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Mapp has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Mapp does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Mapp does not | Mapp publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Loopsloops.so | 75/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Keapkeap.com | 61/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Airshipairship.com | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Insideruseinsider.com | 50/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Brazebraze.com | 48/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Customerlycustomerly.io | 57/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Postscriptpostscript.io | 56/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| GetResponsegetresponse.com | 50/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Verogetvero.com | 50/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Beehiivbeehiiv.com | 48/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Act-Onact-on.com | 45/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Bloomreachbloomreach.com | 35/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, Status page with history | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +1 | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.