Transparency alternatives to Mapp
Other Marketing automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Mapp. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 34 that differ from Mapp on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Mapp has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Mapp” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Mapp | Found at Mapp, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Keapkeap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Keap | 61/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Loopsloops.soSee also Transparency alternatives to Loops | 61/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| GetResponsegetresponse.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GetResponse | 57/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Airshipairship.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Airship | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Insider Oneinsiderone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Insider One | 52/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Bloomreachbloomreach.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bloomreach | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Brazebraze.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Braze | 35/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Upp.aiupp.aiSee also Transparency alternatives to Upp.ai | 30/100 | 3 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | Compare |
| Customerlycustomerly.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Customerly | 57/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Postscriptpostscript.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Postscript | 56/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Verogetvero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vero | 43/100 | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| CleverTapclevertap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CleverTap | 39/100 | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | 3 Data location stated, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.