Transparency alternatives to Postscript
Other Marketing automation vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Postscript. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 34 that differ from Postscript on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Postscript has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Postscript” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Postscript | Found at Postscript, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mappmapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Mapp | 52/100 | 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Customerlycustomerly.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Customerly | 57/100 | 2 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data processing agreement, Status page with history | Compare |
| GetResponsegetresponse.comSee also Transparency alternatives to GetResponse | 57/100 | 2 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Airshipairship.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Airship | 52/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Insider Oneinsiderone.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Insider One | 52/100 | 2 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Bloomreachbloomreach.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bloomreach | 48/100 | 2 Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
| Brazebraze.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Braze | 35/100 | 2 security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| Replenitreplen.itSee also Transparency alternatives to Replenit | 17/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Keapkeap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Keap | 61/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | nothing | Compare |
| Loopsloops.soSee also Transparency alternatives to Loops | 52/100 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Verogetvero.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vero | 43/100 | 1 Certifications named | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| CleverTapclevertap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to CleverTap | 39/100 | 1 Certifications named | 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.