SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Kanbanchi

Other Project management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Kanbanchi. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 74 that differ from Kanbanchi on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Kanbanchi has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Kanbanchi” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at KanbanchiFound at Kanbanchi, not found there
Airtableairtable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Airtable 91/100 9 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +6 nothing Compare
Smartsheetsmartsheet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Smartsheet 91/100 9 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +6 nothing Compare
monday.commonday.comSee also Transparency alternatives to monday.com 74/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 nothing Compare
Linearlinear.appSee also Transparency alternatives to Linear 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 nothing Compare
Miromiro.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Miro 70/100 6 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
Oraora.pmSee also Transparency alternatives to Ora 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 1 Certifications named Compare
Plutioplutio.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Plutio 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +3 1 Certifications named Compare
Teamworkteamwork.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Teamwork 57/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 1 Public pricing Compare
Breezebreeze.pmSee also Transparency alternatives to Breeze 61/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 nothing Compare
Edworkingedworking.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Edworking 57/100 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 1 Certifications named Compare
Stackfieldstackfield.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Stackfield 52/100 5 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 nothing Compare
OpenProjectopenproject.orgSee also Transparency alternatives to OpenProject 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 1 Certifications named Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.