Alternatives to Shortcut
Other Project management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Shortcut does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 21 that differ from Shortcut on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Shortcut has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “publishes and Shortcut does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Shortcut does not | Shortcut publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airtableairtable.com | 91/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Smartsheetsmartsheet.com | 91/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Linearlinear.app | 80/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Miromiro.com | 74/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| monday.commonday.com | 61/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Data location stated | Compare |
| OpenProjectopenproject.org | 61/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Teamworkteamwork.com | 57/100 | 3 Data processing agreement, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Stackfieldstackfield.com | 52/100 | 3 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Niftyniftypm.com | 43/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Trellotrello.com | 55/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| Asanaasana.com | 48/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | nothing | Compare |
| MeisterTaskmeistertask.com | 43/100 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.