Transparency alternatives to Teamhood
Other Project management vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Teamhood does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 69 that differ from Teamhood on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Teamhood has 9 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Teamhood does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Teamhood does not | Teamhood publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Airtableairtable.com | 91/100 | 8 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| Smartsheetsmartsheet.com | 91/100 | 8 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| Miromiro.com | 74/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Linearlinear.app | 70/100 | 5 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Oraora.pm | 70/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| OpenProjectopenproject.org | 61/100 | 5 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Teamworkteamwork.com | 57/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Stackfieldstackfield.com | 52/100 | 5 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, +2 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Breezebreeze.pm | 61/100 | 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | nothing | Compare |
| monday.commonday.com | 61/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| ClickUpclickup.com | 58/100 | 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| BigTimebigtime.net | 52/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +1 | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.