Transparency alternatives to FrontSpin
Other Sales engagement vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that FrontSpin does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 55 that differ from FrontSpin on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
FrontSpin has 8 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “publishes and FrontSpin does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and FrontSpin does not | FrontSpin publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Lushalusha.com | 74/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| ZoomInfozoominfo.com | 73/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Hunterhunter.io | 70/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +2 | 2 Status page with history, Certifications named | Compare |
| Clearbitclearbit.com | 65/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Showpadshowpad.com | 65/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Mixmaxmixmax.com | 65/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | 1 Status page with history | Compare |
| Snov.iosnov.io | 62/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| PhantomBusterphantombuster.com | 57/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +1 | 2 Public pricing, Certifications named | Compare |
| Albacrossalbacross.com | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Instantlyinstantly.ai | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Revenue.iorevenue.io | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Status page with history, Public pricing | Compare |
| Smartleadsmartlead.ai | 52/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, Named privacy contact | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.