SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to LogesTechs

Other Shipping and logistics vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at LogesTechs. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 66 that differ from LogesTechs on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

LogesTechs has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at LogesTechs” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at LogesTechsFound at LogesTechs, not found there
AfterShipaftership.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AfterShip 83/100 9 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +6 nothing Compare
Sendcloudsendcloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sendcloud 70/100 8 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 nothing Compare
FourKitesfourkites.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FourKites 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 nothing Compare
EasyPosteasypost.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EasyPost 43/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Easyshipeasyship.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Easyship 43/100 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Metapackmetapack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Metapack 43/100 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 nothing Compare
ShipStationshipstation.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ShipStation 43/100 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 nothing Compare
Waybillerwaybiller.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Waybiller 39/100 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Seven Senderssevensenders.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Seven Senders 35/100 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Elromcoelromco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Elromco 30/100 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
Locuslocus.shSee also Transparency alternatives to Locus 30/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare
Shippogoshippo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Shippo 30/100 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 nothing Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.