SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Pacejet

Other Shipping and logistics vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Pacejet. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 77 that differ from Pacejet on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Pacejet has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Pacejet” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at PacejetFound at Pacejet, not found there
AfterShipaftership.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AfterShip 83/100 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 nothing Compare
Sendcloudsendcloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sendcloud 70/100 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +3 nothing Compare
FourKitesfourkites.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FourKites 48/100 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 2 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
EasyPosteasypost.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EasyPost 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Easyshipeasyship.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Easyship 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Metapackmetapack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Metapack 43/100 3 Data processing agreement, Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
ShipStationshipstation.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ShipStation 43/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact nothing Compare
Seven Senderssevensenders.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Seven Senders 35/100 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact 1 Public pricing Compare
Locuslocus.shSee also Transparency alternatives to Locus 30/100 3 Data location stated, Certifications named, Named privacy contact 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare
Waybillerwaybiller.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Waybiller 39/100 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change nothing Compare
Elromcoelromco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Elromco 30/100 2 Certifications named, No third-party tracking before consent nothing Compare
Freightosfreightos.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Freightos 30/100 2 Data location stated, Status page with history 1 HTTPS enforced with HSTS Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.