Transparency alternatives to Quantum Edge Edge TMS
Other Shipping and logistics vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Quantum Edge Edge TMS. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 66 that differ from Quantum Edge Edge TMS on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Quantum Edge Edge TMS has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Quantum Edge Edge TMS” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Quantum Edge Edge TMS | Found at Quantum Edge Edge TMS, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| AfterShipaftership.comSee also Transparency alternatives to AfterShip | 83/100 | 9 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +6 | nothing | Compare |
| Sendcloudsendcloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Sendcloud | 70/100 | 8 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| FourKitesfourkites.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FourKites | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| EasyPosteasypost.comSee also Transparency alternatives to EasyPost | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Easyshipeasyship.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Easyship | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Metapackmetapack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Metapack | 43/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| ShipStationshipstation.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ShipStation | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Waybillerwaybiller.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Waybiller | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Seven Senderssevensenders.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Seven Senders | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Elromcoelromco.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Elromco | 30/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Locuslocus.shSee also Transparency alternatives to Locus | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Shippogoshippo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Shippo | 30/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.