Alternatives to Stellar Cyber
Other SIEM and security operations vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that Stellar Cyber does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 23 that differ from Stellar Cyber on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Stellar Cyber has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and Stellar Cyber does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and Stellar Cyber does not | Stellar Cyber publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Expelexpel.com | 61/100 | 6 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Huntresshuntress.com | 57/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Pantherpanther.com | 52/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, +2 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Red Canaryredcanary.com | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Trend Microtrendmicro.com | 39/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Certifications named, +2 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Gigamongigamon.com | 35/100 | 5 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Corelightcorelight.com | 43/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Uptime SLA with a figure | Compare |
| Vectra AIvectra.ai | 39/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Filigranfiligran.io | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Blumirablumira.com | 30/100 | 4 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 1 Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Cybereasoncybereason.com | 30/100 | 4 Data location stated, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Cynetcynet.com | 30/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Uptime SLA with a figure, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.