Transparency alternatives to Digital Endpoint
Other Workforce and shift management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Digital Endpoint. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 71 that differ from Digital Endpoint on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Digital Endpoint has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Digital Endpoint” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Digital Endpoint | Found at Digital Endpoint, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agendrixagendrix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agendrix | 70/100 | 8 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| Timelytimelyapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Timely | 65/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| 7shifts7shifts.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 7shifts | 48/100 | 6 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Deputydeputy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deputy | 48/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Hubstaffhubstaff.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hubstaff | 39/100 | 6 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| actiTIMEactitime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to actiTIME | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| TimeCamptimecamp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TimeCamp | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| RotaCloudrotacloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RotaCloud | 43/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Time Doctortimedoctor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Time Doctor | 43/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Beebolebeebole.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Beebole | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Clockodoclockodo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clockodo | 30/100 | 5 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Findmyshiftfindmyshift.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Findmyshift | 45/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.