Transparency alternatives to Sierra Workforce Solutions
Other Workforce and shift management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Sierra Workforce Solutions. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 71 that differ from Sierra Workforce Solutions on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Sierra Workforce Solutions has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Sierra Workforce Solutions” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Sierra Workforce Solutions | Found at Sierra Workforce Solutions, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agendrixagendrix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agendrix | 70/100 | 8 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +5 | nothing | Compare |
| Timelytimelyapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Timely | 65/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| 7shifts7shifts.comSee also Transparency alternatives to 7shifts | 48/100 | 6 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Deputydeputy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deputy | 48/100 | 6 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| Hubstaffhubstaff.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hubstaff | 39/100 | 6 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| actiTIMEactitime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to actiTIME | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| TimeCamptimecamp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TimeCamp | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| RotaCloudrotacloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RotaCloud | 43/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Time Doctortimedoctor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Time Doctor | 43/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Beebolebeebole.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Beebole | 39/100 | 5 Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Clockodoclockodo.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Clockodo | 30/100 | 5 Public pricing, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Findmyshiftfindmyshift.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Findmyshift | 45/100 | 4 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.