Transparency alternatives to Teramind
Other Workforce and shift management vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Teramind. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 81 that differ from Teramind on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Teramind has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, No third-party tracking before consent, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Teramind” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Teramind | Found at Teramind, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Agendrixagendrix.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agendrix | 70/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Timelytimelyapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Timely | 65/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +4 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| actiTIMEactitime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to actiTIME | 48/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| DeskTimedesktime.comSee also Transparency alternatives to DeskTime | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Public pricing, +2 | 2 HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Deputydeputy.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Deputy | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Jibblejibble.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Jibble | 48/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| TimeCamptimecamp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to TimeCamp | 48/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Public pricing, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| RotaCloudrotacloud.comSee also Transparency alternatives to RotaCloud | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Tempotempo.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Tempo | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Time Doctortimedoctor.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Time Doctor | 43/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Beebolebeebole.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Beebole | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | 1 security.txt (RFC 9116) | Compare |
| Hubstaffhubstaff.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hubstaff | 39/100 | 4 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +1 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.