Transparency alternatives to Placement Partner
Other Applicant tracking vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Placement Partner. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 42 that differ from Placement Partner on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Placement Partner has 12 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “Found there, not found at Placement Partner” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Placement Partner | Found at Placement Partner, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Jobvitejobvite.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Jobvite | 83/100 | 9 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Data location stated, +6 | nothing | Compare |
| JazzHRjazzhr.comSee also Transparency alternatives to JazzHR | 65/100 | 7 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Workableworkable.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Workable | 61/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| SmartRecruiterssmartrecruiters.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SmartRecruiters | 57/100 | 7 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +4 | nothing | Compare |
| Bullhornbullhorn.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Bullhorn | 48/100 | 6 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +3 | nothing | Compare |
| PrimePROprimepro.netSee also Transparency alternatives to PrimePRO | 48/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Homerunhomerun.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Homerun | 43/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Leverlever.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Lever | 43/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Manatalmanatal.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Manatal | 43/100 | 5 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| iCIMSicims.comSee also Transparency alternatives to iCIMS | 39/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Joinjoin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Join | 39/100 | 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +2 | nothing | Compare |
| Ashbyashbyhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Ashby | 35/100 | 5 Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, +2 | nothing | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.