Transparency alternatives to Walnut
Other Customer success and onboarding vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Walnut. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 35 that differ from Walnut on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
Walnut has 6 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116). The column “Found there, not found at Walnut” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Found there, not found at Walnut | Found at Walnut, not found there | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dockdock.usSee also Transparency alternatives to Dock | 87/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Totangototango.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Totango | 74/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 1 Public pricing | Compare |
| Rocketlanerocketlane.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Rocketlane | 68/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Gainsightgainsight.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Gainsight | 61/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, Public pricing | Compare |
| Arcadearcade.softwareSee also Transparency alternatives to Arcade | 57/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data location stated, Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| ClientSuccessclientsuccess.comSee also Transparency alternatives to ClientSuccess | 48/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Demostackdemostack.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Demostack | 35/100 | 3 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | Compare |
| Navatticnavattic.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Navattic | 57/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data location stated, Status page with history | Compare |
| Custcust.coSee also Transparency alternatives to Cust | 52/100 | 2 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Status page with history, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Arrowsarrows.toSee also Transparency alternatives to Arrows | 48/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, Named privacy contact | Compare |
| Chameleontrychameleon.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chameleon | 48/100 | 2 Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 2 Data processing agreement, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
| Reprisereprise.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Reprise | 48/100 | 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS | 3 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Notice before subprocessors change | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.