Alternatives to ReconArt
Other Financial planning and close vendors we measure, sorted by how much they publish that ReconArt does not. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.
12 shown of 26 that differ from ReconArt on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.
ReconArt has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact. The column “publishes and ReconArt does not” is the one that closes them.
| Vendor | Score | Publishes, and ReconArt does not | ReconArt publishes, and they do not | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Leapfinleapfin.com | 61/100 | 6 Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +3 | 1 Certifications named | Compare |
| Datarailsdatarails.com | 43/100 | 5 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | Compare |
| Drivetraindrivetrain.ai | 52/100 | 4 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change, +1 | nothing | Compare |
| Alephgetaleph.com | 39/100 | 4 Subprocessor list, Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | Compare |
| FloQastfloqast.com | 39/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, Public pricing, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | Compare |
| Anaplananaplan.com | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | Compare |
| Numericnumeric.io | 35/100 | 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | Compare |
| BlackLineblackline.com | 38/100 | 3 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Notice before subprocessors change | 1 Data processing agreement | Compare |
| Abacumabacum.io | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | Compare |
| Heluhelu.io | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | Compare |
| Kyribakyriba.com | 26/100 | 3 Data location stated, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | Compare |
| Runwayrunway.com | 22/100 | 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, Named privacy contact | 2 Data processing agreement, Certifications named | Compare |
Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.