SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Serrala

Other Financial planning and close vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Serrala. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 45 that differ from Serrala on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Serrala has 10 gaps in what we could measure: Data processing agreement, Subprocessor list, Status page with history, Public pricing, Certifications named, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change. The column “Found there, not found at Serrala” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at SerralaFound at Serrala, not found there
Leapfinleapfin.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Leapfin 61/100 5 Data processing agreement, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +2 nothing Compare
Venavenasolutions.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Vena 52/100 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 nothing Compare
BlackLineblackline.comSee also Transparency alternatives to BlackLine 38/100 4 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Cubecubesoftware.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Cube 35/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare
SecureSheetsecuresheet.comSee also Transparency alternatives to SecureSheet 35/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, Notice before subprocessors change 1 Named privacy contact Compare
Planfulplanful.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Planful 30/100 3 Subprocessor list, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
Anaplananaplan.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Anaplan 26/100 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Data location stated Compare
Treasury Intelligencetis.bizSee also Transparency alternatives to Treasury Intelligence 26/100 3 Status page with history, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Pliantgetpliant.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Pliant 22/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Agicapagicap.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Agicap 17/100 3 Public pricing, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) 2 Data location stated, Named privacy contact Compare
Alephgetaleph.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Aleph 39/100 2 Subprocessor list, HTTPS enforced with HSTS nothing Compare
FloQastfloqast.comSee also Transparency alternatives to FloQast 30/100 2 Status page with history, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 1 Named privacy contact Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.