SaaS Ranking

Transparency alternatives to Gorgias

Other Helpdesk vendors we measure, sorted by how much we found at them and not at Gorgias. This is a comparison of disclosure, not of features or fitness.

12 shown of 50 that differ from Gorgias on at least one criterion we measured for both. Public transparency score, not a product or security rating.

Gorgias has 5 gaps in what we could measure: Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent. The column “Found there, not found at Gorgias” is the one that closes them.

VendorScoreFound there, not found at GorgiasFound at Gorgias, not found there
Intercomintercom.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Intercom 70/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 1 Status page with history Compare
Dixadixa.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Dixa 61/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, Uptime SLA with a figure, +1 3 Status page with history, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Dragdragapp.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Drag 43/100 4 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, +1 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +2 Compare
Desk365desk365.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Desk365 74/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 2 Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116) Compare
Frontfront.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Front 52/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Status page with history, Notice before subprocessors change, Named privacy contact Compare
Kustomerkustomer.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Kustomer 52/100 3 Data location stated, Uptime SLA with a figure, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Hiverhiverhq.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Hiver 48/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 3 Data processing agreement, security.txt (RFC 9116), Notice before subprocessors change Compare
Crispcrisp.chatSee also Transparency alternatives to Crisp 43/100 3 Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS, No third-party tracking before consent 5 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, Certifications named, +2 Compare
Helpwisehelpwise.ioSee also Transparency alternatives to Helpwise 43/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Data processing agreement, Certifications named, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Chatwootchatwoot.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Chatwoot 39/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
Helplyhelply.comSee also Transparency alternatives to Helply 39/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare
HelpSpacehelpspace.comSee also Transparency alternatives to HelpSpace 39/100 3 Data location stated, Public pricing, HTTPS enforced with HSTS 4 Data processing agreement, Status page with history, security.txt (RFC 9116), +1 Compare

Only criteria we could measure for both are counted. Where we could measure one and not the other, the row is silent: that would be a statement about our measurement, not about either vendor. Every single result with its source is on the two profiles.